Reply to post: Re: "Serverless" is a marketing term. No more, no less.

Serverless: Should we be scared? Maybe. Is it a silly name? Possibly

wallyhall

Re: "Serverless" is a marketing term. No more, no less.

And (forgive me if I'm misunderstanding here) the concept of having a bunch of individual units of logic with a well-defined input and output running and interconnected transparently over multiple distributed and disparate pieces of hardware doesn't feel particularly new either. (I'm far too young to have used it, but I believe Plan9 was possibly just "too ahead of its time"?)

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon