Reply to post: Re: It's not wall clock time that's being timed

How are the shares, Bry? Intel chief cops to CPU fix slowdowns

Peter Boyle

Re: It's not wall clock time that's being timed

You are a bit too quick there.

Yes, making rtdsc, or equivalent, any other form of high resolution clock only "tick" at the 10s granularity instead of the nanosecond granularity would make it a lot harder. However, all of these "fixes" are susceptible to running the test for 10^n longer and still being able to read at 1/10^n the rate.

Making ALL forms of time information non-functional would leave a non-functional computer. Not

TCP/IP retransmits, no correct date stamps, nothing.

Making the computer completely, absolutely secure is possible if you give up functionality.

Take out the plug, burn the battery and fry the hard drive. The tricky thing is to not give up functionality and still keep the security.

Here, KPTI is giving up a bit of the functionality (performance) and that isn't great, but is the best

compromise currently.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon