Reply to post: Re: Old is new again?

We translated Intel's crap attempt to spin its way out of CPU security bug PR nightmare

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Re: Old is new again?

> I haven't heard about anyone "this time" mysteriously jumping any gun, what do they mean by that?

As the article reads like a cut 'n' paste job, it's not worth while trying to analyse it. The layers of obfuscation are geological in complexity, suggestions it's just a software issue, poor Intel with some fearful leaker being nasty to them, suggestions of it all being sorted if only they'd had time etc etc. Even El Reg has had to conflate two separate issues, and each is complex. Expect colleagues, family and friends to start conversations with you today with "I don't understand what they mean..."

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon