Seems fair
"It claimed Malwarebytes' blockade was a retaliatory strike after Enigma sued a tech support blog that published a bad review"
Is that supposed to be a problem? Even if the various issues others have listed with the actual software weren't valid enough reason to block it, removing products made by a company that will sue you if they don't like what you say about them seems perfectly reasonable. If the best defence Enigma could come up with is "We're a bunch of cunts and Malwarebytes were just trying to protect people from us", it's hardly a surprise that they lost.
