It's all about greed. Do anything. Kiss anything. Debase yourself anyway. To rake it in.
So, that's the CrowdStrike brought in by the DNC to emit unverifiable proof of Russian Hacking of the DNC servers around July 5, which was then "made plausible" by someone calling himself Guccifer 2.0 emitting russiana-tainted word-docs as marker material? Then it turns that it got all hoovered up via USB 2,0 device...
One reasonable objection to these findings is that Crowdstrike’s excellent cyber protection system, Falcon, was in place prior to July 05, and, therefore, a hack could not have occurred on this date. The locale of the 5th event is in question, whether on a DNC server or later on a copy previously made. True, the action could have been on an earlier copy, in which case Falcon is irrelevant. However, were the action to have occurred on a DNC server then questions arise on the protection granularity decision making criteria of Falcon. For instance, would Falcon stop a DNC user with privileged access, e.g., System Programmer or even a regular authorized user, from copying/downloading something? Here, the conclusion is that it was a local copy, so this question is relevant.
ZERO CREDIBILITY!
Biting the hand that feeds IT
