Reply to post: Re: Remote pilots?

Boeing preps pilotless passenger flights – once it has solved the Sully problem, of course

Remy Redert

Re: Remote pilots?

Who would you trust to implement remote piloting in a way that is safe and yet can still be accessed in an emergency? Remember, lots of people will need the key because the remote pilot will have to be relatively close to the airplane in distress, otherwise latency means it's only giving instructions to the auto pilot instead of actually flying.

Any remote control facility is open to abuse. The risk is higher the greater the impact of abuse, the lower the quality of code and the more people need access to the remote control option.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon