> Can I use that excuse for the no one on 250Mbps to.
I'd be more interseted in knowing why you think RSPs are not offering plans faster than 100Mbps. Hint: Labor's financial model makes it too expensive. The Coalition has depressed the demand for faster speeds by lowering CVC pricing faster than Labor planned but not reducing AVC.
> Btw the nbn was originally plan to make a return.
Which was unlikely to occur.
> Having people in the higher speeds paying for the neighbors slower speeds. But you have failed in you method.
The growth as stated by Labor in the NBNCo Corporate Plan was in CVC revenue. Removing speed tiers would have seen CVC revenue grow more quickly as people stream movies in HD & QHD. The difference between speed and data is this: You can conserve your data use for what is important but you cannot conserve speed to engage in an activity that requires 100Mbps+. This is why speed tiers have created a digital divide.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
