Re: Actions == consequences
I don't believe the Aussies get a veto on where we send him to, if and when we eventually deport him somewhere.
That was my understanding too based on commentary by qualified legal counsel on previous events. Specifically, he would have been safer in Sweden against supposed extradition to the US. If extradited to Sweden a condition would automatically be attached preventing subsequent re-extradition without explicit UK consent. Over here he can be extradited without fourth party involvement.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
