Tied, same old argument, it's just not true.
They said the same about mobile phones at one point. Why does anyone feel it necessary to pay circa $1000 for an iPhone or Samsung equivalent - because, in business (or just life), it's a tool you rely on. If you can rely on it and it makes you money, regards your line of work - you'll never think twice about what you're paying for it/paid for it. It has an intangible worth to you.
It blends into the background and becomes the same as most other expenses required to do a job. But ultimately, BT need to make Ultrafast reliable and if reliability is key to reaching those higher 'ever rolling' price points, G.fast is not the technology to using.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
