Reply to post: Re: @LeeE: @DougS

Qualcommotion: Sueball return alleges Apple 'pay-to-play' deal

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Re: @LeeE: @DougS

I wasn't thinking in terms of Apple's liability for violation of FRAND, just that I think that Apple must have known that they were agreeing to a deal in which FRAND was being violated because Qualcomm couldn't have priced on percentage without knowing the cost of the phones/tablets in which their products were being used, which in turn, they could only have got from Apple. Apple also would have looked at the prices being charged and realised that they were being charged on a percentage but did the deal anyway instead of reporting it.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon