"So isn't Uber aiding and abetting a criminal/interfering with a police investigation?"
As much as I think that Uber are the epitome of amorality and greed and a perfect example of how not to run a company, I disagree with that statement. I don't think that because something is really handy to law enforcement to arrest someone that not being able to rely on that means they are actively being interfered with. It isn't like they have said "Hey, this is the law, give us unfettered access to your systems or else taser!". More like their job is not as easy.*
*Although, it seems that this is now becoming an offence...at least where it wasn't before.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
