Reply to post: "companies should consider building redundancy into their cloud instances "

$310m AWS S3-izure: Why everyone put their eggs in one region

John Smith 19 Gold badge
Holmes

"companies should consider building redundancy into their cloud instances "

Interesting about the pricing.

Especially if they are like Adobe and Salesforce, who make it difficult (impossible?) to run locally.

In fact it's not a cloud. It's a set of islands of processing and storage with different prices to ship and from them, and between them.

I had thought it was one price regardless of where Amazon puts your stuff. In fact I thought they load balanced, migrating processing as needed.

Y'know, the whole "It's in the cloud, it doesn't matter where it runs" b***cks.

Obviously I was wrong.

This also has characteristics of the looks like the AT&T phone system crash when one (voice) exchange crashed and the bug in the fail over software propagated the crash to other exchanges.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon