Reply to post: Re: Lies and Urban Myths

Tuesday's AWS S3-izure exposes Amazon-sized internet bottleneck

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Re: Lies and Urban Myths

Amazon absolutely are on that list - they provide many different data centers for failover and continuity and provide multiple tools to enable that. Yes, it's more expensive to deploy this way and, yes, it's more complicated. The blame for the failures of applications using AWS is 100% on the customers who cheaped out and didn't build resiliency into their deployment architectures.

Amazon have some lessons to learn about their own status and notification tools and making sure they operate during an outage, but overall this has been a valuable lesson in identifying those companies that are too stupid or miserly to use the proper tools available to them. Plus some truly shocking deployment decisions - web fonts stored on S3? Config files for a mouse? Complete failure of security systems when one AWS node goes down? FFS, are all your developers 19?

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon


Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020