Reply to post: Re: Malice is not authorised.

I was authorized to trash my employer's network, sysadmin tells court

Charles 9

Re: Malice is not authorised.

But people in the US are presumed innocent. Meaning there must be a specific, referrable Act that doesn't allow it for a man to be tried. That act is always cited when your charge is read.

Which Act covers general nonphysical malice against one's employer by means of authorized access?

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon