Reply to post: Re: 2017 and male managers still consider this "appropriate" behavior with women staff?

In colossal shock, Uber alleged to be wretched hive of sexism, craven managerial ass-covering

Arctic fox
Headmaster

Re: 2017 and male managers still consider this "appropriate" behavior with women staff?

I entirely agree. On a more general point one would have thought that any modern company would make it clear to its managers that good personal behaviour towards their subordinates is regarded as a key part of their abilities as a manager. That personally objectionable behaviour (regardless of its specific nature) towards members of staff who are junior to them will be regarded as a potential sacking offence regardless of how good they may or may not be at other aspects of their work. It is sadly a fact that the concept "human resources" is something that is honoured in the breach rather than the observance in all too many companies.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon