Re: Lies
The evidence in that article -a screen capture that is trivially easy to fake- means that it could either be herself making the threats or any of the gazillion of hominines that populate the Internets. Which one is the most probable? ;-)
If this 'evidence' was conclusive, then the FBI would have put A. Sarkeesian before a judge in a matter of a few weeks, at most. But this happened in 2014 and she's free, so...
On a side note, I'm quite astonished that those messages -some of them related to bomb threats, ffs!- are not being thoroughly investigated and arrests been made, because, you know, terrists!
Biting the hand that feeds IT
