Reply to post: Re: Warrant Canary

UK's new Snoopers' Charter just passed an encryption backdoor law by the backdoor

Dr. Mouse

Re: Warrant Canary

"It's fantasy to think that warrant canaries provide some sort of legal escape route."

I do not know how someone could be prosecuted for it, though.

You place a factual statement, which is not illegal, on your website. When asked to provide info, that statement is no longer factual. You *Must*, therefore, remove it from your website, or else be done by, say, ASA. Or even be sued when someone finds out. If this is classified as having informed the public, you are put in the position of having to do one illegal thing or another.

If I was on a jury in a case like this, I would conclude that the catch-22 was a get out. No matter the judges instructions, I would find not guilty, as it was the only moral thing a person or company could do in that situation.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon