Re: Spanking or caning that leaves a visible mark is out, as well as anything involving urination
No, if it's classifiable (and Secretary is), then it's fine, but needs to be behind an age-verification wall.
If it's unclassifiable then it's out entirely because it must presumably contain something deemed "obscene" (by 1950s standards).
Of greater note is not just the porn bit, but Maria Miller's 11th-hour amendments submitted on Tuesday which seek to suffix all instances of the words "pornographic material" with "or adult material".
Which could mean anything. It's a serious and profound change to the scope and meaning of the legislation
Biting the hand that feeds IT
