We all ready do...
It's call "Law". Law is a written code of rules. We execute them (um, poor choice of words I know) by hand when applying law or taking things to court.
A computerised system increases fidelity, speed and amount of data.
Can those involved in promoting the idea prove such increases work out? That they don't hit a reduction in returns or just make the system so complex in implodes?
Biting the hand that feeds IT
