Reply to post: Patching only the first step

No wonder we're being hit by Internet of Things botnets. Ever tried patching a Thing?

c1ue

Patching only the first step

Patching sounds good - except that attackers will start inserting attacks via patching mechanisms.

This in turn requires code signing. Which in turn requires more CPU/memory power on the IoT.

Which in turn will result in every IoT device being a full on mobile CPU.

Which in turn makes the patching process more difficult and expensive.

The real issue isn't patching IoT - it is the ridiculous idea of sticking everything onto the Internet with the assumption the functionality improves.

Every move to "secure" IoT has countermoves long ago thought up by attackers, and the fundamental asymmetry of attack resources vs. defense capability - especially in IoT - is not going to change.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon