Re: The title is no longer required
Oh well, folks have had NAT on IPv6 since before 2006. Just means no matter what folks say, we already have it.
And that should be the end of it.
With IPv6, no-one should be forced to use NAT. That's a good thing.
But numerous people are trying to *prevent* anyone using NAT. and that's a bad thing.
Give people the freedom to decide for themselves whether or not to NAT, and the progress of IPv6 will be comparatively easy.
But try to enforce dogma that really isn't necessary, and you will get push-back.
Vic,