Reply to post: Re: "ARM's larger and healthier software ecosystem?"

Fujitsu: Why we chose 64-bit ARM over SPARC for our exascale super

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Re: "ARM's larger and healthier software ecosystem?"

"until a couple of years ago, Linux on ARM was pretty poor."

Maybe the household names didn't have ARM support, but in the small and not-so-small embedded systems Linux world there were plenty of Linuxes (commercially supported and otherwise), some of them more than capable of providing all you need for a compute-oriented node. I used to use MontaVista simply because that's what the hardware/box vendor supported, but other options were readily available.

Whereas neither Intel nor SPARC had (or probably will have in the foreseeable future) any significant presence in the compute-node market. Intel's NextUnitofComputing [1], or this quarter's hot SoC from an ARM partner? It's not really a difficult decision for most people even if Windows is currently a pre-requisite (which is a bit rare in the HPC world, despite several years of MS trying to strongarm people into using Compute Cluster Server 2003 and then Windows HPC Server 2008 and friends).


POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon