jeez. the word you're looking for is "integrity"
anything reported that has been altered does not have integrity. wikileaks would be pretty shit if it didn't have integrity. it HAS to be complete. yes. fair warning should be given.. something like:
"what you are about to receive may not be entirely safe. scan scan scan and then double scan. the contents are sourced from real life situations and that includes secuirty risks and other threats in the wild"
sorry for lack of grammar.