Re: Just another distraction.
The general tone of her position is that the culture of large corporations and lobbying isn't in the public interest.
And therefore, Dr. Stein suggests, we can't trust vaccines since they're made by business, which means if she's not anti-vaccinationist then she's pandering to them with one of their favored arguments.
Worse, despite being a doctor who should be familiar with the vaccine approval process, she keeps describing the process as being dominated by pharmaceutical companies. In fact, the members of the US's FDA's Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory committee work at academic or medical institutions, not drug companies.
By the way, any reason you didn't include her "anti-GMO" views?
As with vaccines, Dr. Stein uses the language of opposition groups. From jill2016.com: "Label GMOs, and put a moratorium on GMOs and pesticides until they are proven safe." No food is so thoroughly tested as GMOs before they enter the food supply - i.e., there's already a moratorium on individual GMOs use until testing is complete - and the ones in the food supply have endlessly proven they're safe. But, nope, gotta pound the anti-GMO drums using the endlessly popular begging the question fallacy, "We should ask, do we really know they're safe?"
And she puts an anti-nuclear plank in her campaign platform. The only science she doesn't seem to equivocate on is global warming.