> "just because BitTorrent is sometimes used for piracy."
> Er no almost all of BitTorrent traffic is piracy some say upto 99.7% of it is.
Leaving aside the unassailable statistical accuracy of "some say", how does that stack up against the use of, say, HTTP or FTP for piracy? At what level of piracy (and other undesirable activity) should those other channels start to be denigrated?
Biting the hand that feeds IT
