Re: Good science
Climategate was bollux.
In that case why have the writers of the emails never repudiated their contents? How do you test the validity of a the contents of an email "with a thermometer and sufficient years"?
Climategate was bollux.
In that case why have the writers of the emails never repudiated their contents? How do you test the validity of a the contents of an email "with a thermometer and sufficient years"?