Reply to post: Doublespeak

PAC slams for lack of evidence-based science investments



Actually, big (capital) science projects have way more evidence than normal government projects, if they didn't then the huge numbers of scientists who didn't get positions on the committee would raise hell. What this is about is the men in the ministry getting in on the act. At the moment the science community still believes in the Haldane principle and, since they are funded by non-departmental bodies, expect BIS et al to leave them to it. This is some civil servants trying to claw back control so they can spend the cash the way they would prefer. Their definition of evidence is probably quite "unique".

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021