Reply to post:

PAC slams for lack of evidence-based science investments

I am the liquor Silver badge

Quite how you make a business case for pure science, I don't understand. No-one knows what it will lead to. Unless the first priority is to build a working futurescope I suppose.

I mean back in the early 1900s, when Schrodinger, Heisenberg, Fermi et al were coming up with all that batshit-crazy-sounding quantum theory stuff, who could possibly have predicted that it would lead to the semiconductors, transistors, microchips, computers, internet and, ultimately, lolcats on which our modern economy is based?

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021