Reply to post: The criticism about Gnome isn't about missing features

Looking good, Gnome: Digesting the Delhi in our belly

Christian Berger

The criticism about Gnome isn't about missing features

The main criticism is that it's simply overcomplex. I mean if you look at it realistically the feature set you'd want from a GUI is roughly the one you got from Windows 3.1. I mean Windows 3.1 even had it's own OOP-style process communications named OLE.

Now you have an overcomplex system which doesn't do much more, but somehow managed to require _way_ more lines of code.

My guess is that there is now a whole generation of people having grown up without gaining any experience in making working designs. After all many universities now teach C++-style OOP as if that's the only way to make software. They see "Open Source" as a way to advance their career. As recruiters typically cannot tell good from bad code, they just stuff their code in where ever they can.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon