Reply to post: Re: Author is Dead Wrong

Why Oracle will win its Java copyright case – and why you'll be glad when it does

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Re: Author is Dead Wrong

> From its onset, Java was open and was meant to be ubiquitous

What he said.

Sun always promoted Java as an open language and ecosystem. That's surely impossible if you cannot re-implement the same environment from scratch - as Google did, with Dalvik. There's the core Java language and there's the Java set of standard libraries which developers code to, and both are intrinsic to the language.

The API is (1) a definition of how to call a library, and (2) how it behaves (or is supposed to behave) when you call it. The first part is a set of function or class prototypes; the second is a description of what those calls do and what they return, which may be in-line text comments or external documentation.

And there's the rub I think: the real copyrightable part is actually the *documentation*

If Google had stripped out all the comments, and referred the user to Sun/Oracle's own documentation of the Java language and APIs, would they be in the clear?

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon


Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020