Reply to post: Still a lot slower than DRAM

Hold the DRAM phone: IBM claims phase-change breakthrough

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Still a lot slower than DRAM

I could see using a smaller amount of DRAM and paging from a phase change backing store, thereby saving power. The performance cost would only be noticeable if you were switching apps constantly, or expecting them all to stay active with a lot of wired memory even when they weren't in the foreground.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon


Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020