Re: Odds
@mr.K
I suggest you go and Google Tunguska, or if that's not close enough in time to worry you, how about Chelyabinsk.
Both of those were near misses, that could have so easily been much, much worse. Maybe not extinction level, but seriously disruptive.
Perhaps you might then consider the justification here to be a little less thin?.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
