Reply to post: Re: Publishers could simply

Ad-blocker blocking websites face legal peril at hands of privacy bods

quattroprorocked

Re: Publishers could simply

FWIW, I would not have video pop under blow up jump out ads on any site I ran, and back then, I didn't. Static image and text is all I allowed. It's all I'd allow now.

I think disruptive ads are a pain that pisses off the audience, and any site that used them would have a hard time keeping me as a reader even if they were safe.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon