Re: Unsigned....
Would help to have a u++, rather than u-- :-). Also, such counters are often used to index arrays, which start at 0...
WHOOSH!
Assuming "u" is unsigned, I believe you may have missed the rapier-like subtlety of decrementing an unsigned integer below zero...
That u < 200 will actually work. Sure, there will be 101 iterations of the loop before it exits. And it looks shit. And will confuse anyone reading it. But logically it will still work. Unless "u" is signed, then it's a much longer count.
Doesn't make it suck less hard though...
Biting the hand that feeds IT
