Reply to post: @misc. folks talking about Xenix ...

SCO's last arguments in 'Who owns Linux?' case vs. IBM knocked out

jake Silver badge

@misc. folks talking about Xenix ...

"Wasn't Xenix a Microsoft OS?"

No. Xenix was actually licensed by Microsoft from AT&T in the late 1970s. From what I remember it was the standard PDP11 Version 7 Unix source code, un-modified by Microsoft. SCO ported it to the IBM PC's 8086/8088 architecture in roughly 1983. Most of us yawned ... although looking back, it was a pretty good hack by SCO[1]!

Before SCO's port was released, there was a TRS-68000 version, a Zilog Z8001 port, and an Altos 8086 version (not necessarily in that order). Microsoft didn't write any of them, rather the third-party companies in question did the coding. Seems to me I once saw an Apple Lisa running Xenix, not certain who did that port. Can anyone jog my memory?

For more on my take on *real* SCO, see these posts:

http://forums.theregister.co.uk/post/689823

http://forums.theregister.co.uk/post/730522

http://forums.theregister.co.uk/post/732820

http://forums.theregister.co.uk/post/619757

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon