Reply to post:

Court to Wikimedia: Your NSA spying evidence is inadmissable, so you can't prove NSA spying

Asterix the Gaul

So,logically,if Wiki has NSA data aquired from Edward Snowden,it (Wiki)must be free to publish without fear of prosecution,because any such published 'evidence' is 'inadmissable' in a court of law.

Being 'inadmissable' means that no 'evidence' of 'substance' can be used against Wiki.

It's funny how 'immunity' from prosecution can come about 'accidentally' by the very law's that the state uses against those that are a threat to the state's impunity'.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon