Reply to post: Re: Smart?

UK energy minister rejects 'waste of money' smart meters claim

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Re: Smart?

Interesting. Manufacturing cost should be low, as there’s not much more than a pcb and display in a modern meter.

Absolutely correct. But don't forget the fact that these all need to be calibrated to NMRO standards, we need the paperwork to follow through on everything, there are a whole range of different models (no standardisation!), the logistics for installation are expensive, one-time-only organisations, the roll out will be inherently inefficient, and that's before the additional reasons I can't elaborate for commercial reasons for significant cost increases through to 2020+.

If government were were doing the job properly, they'd obligate the DNOs (not suppliers) to do smart metering but only on an asset renewal basis, and they'd set a single national specification, consult to kingdom come before locking the spec in (software) stone, and then award a single national meter contract to a manufacturer.

But as usual they're spending your money, and in this case it isn't even officially tax-funded, so DECC really couldn't give a shit, and they've gone for the most misbegotten mess in many decades.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon