Reply to post: Re: Secure Boot

Windows' Nemesis: Pre-boot malware pwns payment processors

Panopticon

Re: Secure Boot

Re: Flaw's in secure Boot (Really, I'm Interested)

It's secure - we've heard that before, Sony say's the same thing about it's EEPROM boot-loader on the PS4 and then a load of Brazilian gamers figure out that with a Raspberry Pi you can rewrite the EEPROM to have any damn boot-loader (JAISPI). Any implementation of Windows itself is flawed because Windows embraces broken Web standards like HTML 5 and bundles it into it's PRISM based internet exploding browser whilst other people desperately work there hand at trying to patch there huge fuck-up's and try to remove there shit. They screwed the implementation of Kerberos then they screwed implementation of Bit-locker in Windows 10 and it's worthy of note that no version of Windows actually ships with OpenSSL that's something you the end users are expected to add-on, this is the off-spring of Caldera still eating it's own children and destroying the web in the name of better advertising and marketing along with it's chums at Google who quote Steve Jobs as being a great visionary when Steve Jobs was last quoted as having said and I quote "Android and G-Docs is Shit!" Exploits against Kerberos, against SSL & SSH, against etc, etc, etc where have we heard all that before.. Oh that whistle-blowing guy who told everybody to go use Debian, then when everybody start's using Linux, suddenly Linux falls on the scum-bag trading list as malware that supports terrorism and suddenly System-D and other such horse-shit that allows crime ware and Trojans in Linux suddenly spreads it's affluence with effluence and projects that try to mitigate the crap with sane Libs like uLibC and Musl with grSecurity instead of SELinux and MAC get hosed.

These guys at the NSA & GCHQ with there friends at Google coming out with horse-shit like "Ubuntu LTS" is the most "secure" distribution ever, are really starting to piss everybody including the Securities Exchange Commission off quite badly. Definition of "Secure" distribution, one that doesn't have your enlarged spying testicles in it or maybe one that hasn't had you deliberately hose the crypto_API with NSA_Key.dll and bundle Javashit into the desktop. I can think of numerous alternatives such as Flex, Pascal and Russian copies of a Windows Clone. (ReactOS FTW) just bundle it with Kerberos version 3.2.2 and CoreForce firewall and viola, you've got Unisys Stealth Core (TM) technology. With a firm two fingers to most major browser vendors including Google!

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon