Reply to post: Re: Pointless Argument

Who's right on crypto: An American prosecutor or a Lebanese coder?

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Re: Pointless Argument

wwwwhhhhhhhhhhhhooooooooooosssssssshhhhh...............

The object is not to "protect" the honest law abiding cattle: The object to to increase surveillance OF THOSE honest law abiding cattle. "Because terrorists" and "because paedophiles" are mere excuses. OF COURSE actual terrorists and paedophiles (and all sophisticated criminals) know they need quality cryptography and use it and will continue to use it.

The FACT that these same disingenuous bureaucrats pop up EVERY time something bad happens somewhere in the world, to squeal for more pork, is DISGUSTING.

The FACT that none of these bad things is averted despite the FACT that the TLAs ALREADY know of the culprits and ALREADY infest practically everything pours contemptuous lashings of hypocrisy upon that DISGUSTING.

They are ALREADY drowning in their ocean of superfluous "intelligence"

"Scum" doesn't come close to doing these people justice. What proportion of YOUR rights and YOUR GDP do you want them to take?

Your Lord Protectors have no interest in protecting you.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon