Reply to post: Re: Does there need to be an obligation to "encrypt" ?

TalkTalk attack: 'No legal obligation to encrypt customer bank details', says chief

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Re: Does there need to be an obligation to "encrypt" ?

Kinda sorta like "Obviousness" to a "Practitioner of the Art" in patent law here. It's patently obvious (tongue firmly in cheek) that effective encryption and ACL's should be involved in any solution that comes from these hands but... It's for a court to decide.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021