Reply to post: alternative protection

Anti-peeping-tom drone law nixed in California

graeme leggett

alternative protection

Does the state have any laws relating to privacy (or nuisance) that also cover this situation?

Also I assume they'd worked out that at 350 ft, you can't see much on an average drone camera. But given press 'Persistence' wouldn't they just use bigger drone with bigger lens.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon