Reply to post: Re: Windows 3.1 was awful

Twenty years since Windows 95, and we still love our Start buttons

chivo243 Silver badge

Re: Windows 3.1 was awful

"Windows 95 had better design, less competition, and more obvious benefits."

I have to believe there were many more logical minds inventing the Win95 start menu, than designing user interfaces we must endure today.

I guess I'm holding it wrong...

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon