Reply to post: Re: GPL == security?

Linux Foundation wants open source projects to show you their steenking badges


Re: GPL == security?

It's not a stance I agree with but I think their logic is something along the lines of: anyone shipping GPL code who patches a security vulnerability must also make available the code for that patch. Compare that to a BSD license for example where two companies may be running the same software but one has access to patches the other does not.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon