Pull the other one
"On the other hand, we have seen evidence that the present legal framework authorising the interception of communications is unclear
Stunning. So the conclusion is its all completely legal and proportionate and all they have is a bit of a PR issue with clarity in the public mind. What utter bollocks. As usual, its a one sided 'conversation' in which someone purports to know the public mind, but strangely enough comes up with a really pretty "business as usual" shaped solution while claiming some sort of reform. How very Blairite.
The fact is, privacy is and will remain something that each defines for themselves according to their perception and needs, most of which will fall far inside the bounds of legality. All GCHQs cheerleaders are doing is fooling themselves if they think bandying this drivel around changes that one jot.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
