"Without knowing the context... How do you know she wasn't provoked by her co-workers in the minutes before that recording?"
That's no excuse for her abusive, and lack of professional, conduct. How about reading the article again. "She persistently abuses her staff with foul-mouthed outbursts." "Staff expressed their concerns to management at CLMTV at the beginning of 2014." "Inspector of Work and Social Security rules the matter a "very serious" breach of employment law."
How much more context do you need?
PS. "you have no way of knowing whether she really means the threats or not."
Maybe YOU don't know if she really means to KILL anyone, but rational people do know the difference between abusive, empty, over the top threats such as hers, and real threats to kill such as Taliban or ISIS. It's not the threats, it's the abuse. Geddit?
Biting the hand that feeds IT
