Reply to post: Re: Why Hyper-V is a non-starter in all situations

If hypervisor is commodity, why is VMware still on top?

Lusty

Re: Why Hyper-V is a non-starter in all situations

You have yet to learn your lessons by the look of it. That's generally the attitude of small environment admins who are king of their world, or BOFHs as we call them. Real admins do their job and keep things up to date with proper change control and testing to ensure platform stability AND SECURITY. Just because it didn't crash doesn't mean it isn't vulnerable, and there have been numerous stability and security issues with VMware 5.x, along with patches which have added functionality such as Windows 2012 support. Of course, you probably still run Windows Server 2003 so that wouldn't bother you, because that's also "stable".

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon