Reply to post:

Alleged Silk Road boss's lawyers want murder-for-hire evidence blocked from trial

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Not in the slightest.

This case is

The defendent is guilty/not guilty of the charges against him based on this evidence

(not hearsay, not character, not upbringing, voting record, drinking record or criminal record)

Just because he is the type to have committed this crime and has been found to have committed many similar crimes to this does not make him guilty of this one.

Where is the direct evidence linking him with this (drugs) crime.

The reason for the trial ordering is to make subsequent trials easier for the prosecution.

If he is found guilty of the drugs thing the it will be easier to make a case for the murder plot thing (motive)

If found guilty of the murder thing then laundering/evasion will be easier to prove (motive and means)

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR WEEKLY TECH NEWSLETTER

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020