Re: alternatives
How many times is this going to be used to justify using illegal actions because WHAT I WANT MUST TAKE PRECEDENCE?!
I hear paraphrases of that all the time, from politicians and security service agents. We have clear laws on, for instance, wiretapping, which are ignored time and again because what the NSA want must take precedence. What GCHQ want must take precedence. What Theresa May wants must take precedence.
We, the people, are simply learning by observing. Funny how that works out, isn't it?
Biting the hand that feeds IT
