Re: This is an ideological post opposed to an ideological book.
Not really.
It's an explanatory article opposed to a stupid book.
The book is self-contradictory and cherry-picks parts of theories while ignoring the remainder of the theory.
That's like accepting that Gravity holds the Moon in orbit while also insisting that the Moon has no effect on Earthly tides.
(Feel free to steal that analogy)
Biting the hand that feeds IT
