Because this diminish the graviy of those vulnerabilities? And still shouldn't open source code have been reviewed by thousand of eyes to spot those vuilnerabilities earlier? Shouldn't have open source code "more secure" because of that? Of course this is closed source, thereby no one peer reviewed it, right?
Or after all the only real way to have secure code is to design it well, code it better and test it properly - open source or not?
Biting the hand that feeds IT
